Investment Strategy: The Best Ideas of the Best Funds
Examining investment strategy can be useful when evaluating mutual funds, but what information is contained in fund holdings? Do they reveal stock-picking skill?
The first article in this series introduced investment strategy as an alternative to the Style Grid for forming active equity mutual fund peer groups. The second article discussed the advantage of diversifying equity portfolios based on fund strategy and proposed a six-strategy core equity portfolio. The third article explained how to identify the best funds within each strategy, while the fourth article described when stock picking works best.
Best Idea Stocks
Indeed, as was argued in an earlier article, the best active equity funds consistently pursue a narrowly defined investment strategy while taking high-conviction positions in their own strategy stocks. The result is these best funds outperform. It is obvious that superior performance is the result of stock-picking skill, a conclusion documented in a wide range of studies.
It is only natural to ask if it is possible to identify high-conviction stocks, those that the investment team, after careful analysis, have selected as having the best chance of generating higher returns going forward versus those stocks with low return expectations. Disappointingly, the latter make up the majority of stocks held by the typical fund. Unfortunately, buy-side analysts and portfolio managers, unlike sell-side analysts, do not publish reports on the stocks they analyze. Instead they use this private information for their buy and sell decisions. Consequently, there is no easy route to unlock this information.
Identifying Best Idea Stocks
An interesting question is whether the size of a particular stock holding in a fund’s portfolio reveals anything useful. Can holdings information be used to identify best idea stocks and thus point to stock-picking skill?
Alpha generating, high conviction, best idea stocks can be identified using relative, as compared to absolute, fund holdings.
For this to be the case, funds would have to determine a stock’s portfolio weight based on the level of conviction regarding the stock. The simplest solution would be to invest more in high-conviction stocks and less in low-conviction stocks given the incentive to generate superior returns.
Many studies confirm that alpha generating, high conviction, best idea stocks can be identified using relative, as compared to absolute, fund holdings. These studies include Chen, Jegadeesh, and Wermers (2000); Pomorski (2009); Cohen, Polk and Silli (2010); Shumway, Szeter and Yuan (2011); Wermers, Yao and Zhao (2012); and Yeung, Pellizzari, Bird and Abidin (2013).
My own research has uncovered a unique way of identifying best idea stocks that differs from that used in the studies cited above. First, the best funds are identified using the fund consistency and conviction measures discussed in the third article in this series. The consistency measure is a comparison of a manager’s holdings to other managers pursuing the same strategy for a pool of stocks upon which to focus. Best idea stocks are those most held (relatively) by these best funds.
The feeds we use are those from Thomson Reuters Lipper and Morningstar mutual fund data. The advantage of these data sources is they deliver holdings data in a realistic time frame that includes latency from funds reporting holdings once a quarter (some funds voluntarily report monthly), as well as the actual time it takes to gather, organize and deliver the data once it is released. Holdings information from these data feeds is 80% within three months of fund reporting and nearly 100% of the data is 6 months or newer, thus it incorporates a realistic level of latency.
As revealed in the chart below, it is possible to identify stock-picking skill using the relative holdings of best funds. The chart reports the average alpha for the ex-ante identified best idea US stocks, roughly 10% of the 3,000 or so stocks held by US active equity funds. The average alpha over this 15-year period is an amazingly large 10%, with 12 of the 15 years producing positive alpha.
ANNUAL ALPHA OF BEST IDEAS US STOCKS OF BEST US ACTIVE EQUITY MUTUAL FUNDS. (JUL-DEC 2003 – JAN – JUN 2018)
Average monthly alpha of best idea US stocks of best US active equity mutual funds times 12. Monthly number of stocks varies between 200 and 300, roughly 10% of all stocks held by funds. Alpha is AEO adjusted stock return net of the average S&P 500 and Russell 2000 index returns. Sources: Morningstar and AthenaInvest.
Focus on Best Idea Stocks
This information provides evidence that active U.S. equity fund managers are skilled stock pickers. Furthermore, they overweight their best idea stocks, which allows for identifying these stocks using relative fund holdings. The monthly turnover within the pool of best idea stocks averages 30%, which means that active equity managers are frequently re-evaluating the attractiveness of top holdings and acting on these changing convictions.
The most important conclusion flowing from these results is that a small number of fund holdings represent alpha-generating, best-idea stocks. Every effort should be made to encourage funds to consistently pursue a narrowly defined strategy while investing primarily in high-conviction stocks.
In the next and final article in this series, we’ll show that investment strategies may be used for tactical allocation. Specifically, the short-term ranks of investor preferences for different strategies are useful for estimating expected market returns
IMPORTANT INFORMATION AND DISCLOSURES
The information provided here is for general informational purposes only and should not be considered an offer or solicitation for the sale or purchase of any specific securities, investments, or investment strategies. It should not be assumed that recommendations of AthenaInvest made herein or in the future will be profitable or will equal the past performance records of any AthenaInvest investment strategy or product. There can be no assurance that future recommendations will achieve comparable results. The author’s opinions may change, without notice, in reaction to shifting economic, market, business, and other conditions. AthenaInvest disclaims any responsibility to update such views. These views may not be relied upon as investment advice or as an indication of trading intent on behalf of AthenaInvest.
You are solely responsible for determining whether any investment, investment strategy, security or related transaction is appropriate for you based on your personal investment objectives and financial circumstances. You should consult with a qualified financial adviser, legal or tax professional regarding your specific situation. Investments involve risk and unless otherwise stated, are not guaranteed. Past Performance is no guarantee of future results